Bacus v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Bacus v. State

650 N.W.2d 241, 264 Neb. 557, 2002 Neb. LEXIS 190

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 9, 2002

DocketS-01-277 through S-01-279

StatusPublished

This text of 650 N.W.2d 241 (Bacus v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bacus v. State, 650 N.W.2d 241, 264 Neb. 557, 2002 Neb. LEXIS 190 (Neb. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Muriel A. Bacus (Bacus) and her two sons, Kyle Bacus and Richard J. Bacus, sustained injuries as a result of a three-vehicle accident. The driver of one of the other vehicles, Ramona C. Meyer, was killed. At the time of the accident, Donald C. Poston, the driver of the van which struck the other two vehicles, was being pursued by a Nebraska State Patrol trooper. Bacus, on behalf of herself and her sons, filed these actions against the State of Nebraska. The district court for Cuming County entered judgment for the State, and Bacus appeals.

The issues raised in these appeals are identical to those raised in Meyer v. State, ante p. 545, 650 N.W.2d 459 (2002). It is therefore unnecessary to restate the facts and analysis. In Meyer, we concluded that the plain language of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 81-8,215.01 (Reissue 1994) (which was in effect at the time of the accident) requires that the actions of a law enforcement officer during a vehicular pursuit be merely a proximate cause of *558 the damage, and not the sole proximate cause. We held that the district court was clearly wrong in finding that the vehicular pursuit was not a proximate cause of the accident which resulted in the injuries to the Bacuses.

Therefore, the judgment of the district court is reversed, and the cause is remanded for a new trial on the issue of damages.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial ON THE ISSUE OF DAMAGES.

Wright, J., participating on briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Muriel A. Bacus (Bacus) and her two sons, Kyle Bacus and Richard J. Bacus, sustained injuries as a result of a three-vehicle accident. The driver of one of the other vehicles, Ramona C. Meyer, was killed. At the time of the accident, Donald C. Poston, the driver of the van which struck the other two vehicles, was being pursued by a Nebraska State Patrol trooper. Bacus, on behalf of herself and her sons, filed these actions against the State of Nebraska. The district court for Cuming County entered judgment for the State, and Bacus appeals.

The issues raised in these appeals are identical to those raised in Meyer v. State, ante p. 545, 650 N.W.2d 459 (2002). It is therefore unnecessary to restate the facts and analysis. In Meyer, we concluded that the plain language of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 81-8,215.01 (Reissue 1994) (which was in effect at the time of the accident) requires that the actions of a law enforcement officer during a vehicular pursuit be merely a proximate cause of *558 the damage, and not the sole proximate cause. We held that the district court was clearly wrong in finding that the vehicular pursuit was not a proximate cause of the accident which resulted in the injuries to the Bacuses.

Therefore, the judgment of the district court is reversed, and the cause is remanded for a new trial on the issue of damages.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial ON THE ISSUE OF DAMAGES.

Wright, J., participating on briefs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

650 N.W.2d 241, 264 Neb. 557, 2002 Neb. LEXIS 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bacus-v-state-neb-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack