Bacon v. Xpress Transp. & Multi Servs., Inc.

2024 NY Slip Op 33650(U)

• Court: New York Supreme Court, New York County
• Decided: October 15, 2024
• Docket: Index No. 159445/2017
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

Bacon v Xpress Transp. & Multi Servs., Inc. 2024 NY Slip Op 33650(U) October 15, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 159445/2017 Judge: James G. Clynes Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. 159445/2017

NYSCEF DOC. NO. 89 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/15/2024

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON . .JAMES G. CLYNES PART 22M Justice ------------------ -- ------ ------------------------ ---------------- ---------- ------X lNDEX NO. I 59445/2017 SUSIE MAE BACON, MOTION DATE 05/14/2024 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 005 - V -

XPRESS TRANSPORT & MULTI SERVICES, INC., JOSE DECISION + ORDER ON BELTRE MOTION Defendants.

--- ------------------ -------------- ---------------------------------- ----- -------X

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 005) 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84,85,86, 87 were read on this motion to/for JUDGMENT - SUMMARY

Upon the foregoing documents, the motion by Defendant XPRESS TRANSPORT &

MULTI SERVICES INC and JOSE BELTRE for summary judgment on the grounds that

Plaintiffs claimed injuries fail to meet the serious injury threshold under Insurance Law 5102 (d)

is decided as follows:

Plaintiff seeks recovery for injuries allegedly sustained as a result of a June 16, 2017 motor

vehicle accident. Plaintiffs Bill of Particulars alleges injures to her cervical spine, lumbar spine,

thoracic spine, brain, and right knee and that those injuries fall within the categories set forth under

Insurance Law 5102( d).

The burden rests upon the movant to establish that the plaintiff has not sustained a serious

injury (love v Bennett, 122 AD2d 728[l st Dept I 9S6]). The burden then shifts to the plaintiff to

sho\v that they did sustain such injury or that there arc questions of fact with objective proof of the

injury to satisfy the statutory serious injury threshold (see Martin v Schwartz, 308 AD2d 318 [1st

Dept 2003]).

159445/2017 BACO~. Sl 1SIE MAE \'S. XPRESS TR.-\:'iSPORT & MUL Tl Page I of 7 Motion No. 005

[* 1] 1 of 7 INDEX NO. 159445/2017

In support of their motion, Defendants rely on the affirmed independent medical

examination report of Dr. Louis Mcintrye, the independent medical examination of Dr. Gary

Bromley, the independent examination of Dr. Vikas Agrawal and the review report of radiologist,

Dr. Scott Springer who reported that Plaintiffs cervical spine, thoracic spine, lumbar spine and

right knee injuries were all resolved and not caused by the accident on June 16, 2017. Dr. Springer

opined, as did Dr. Agrawal, that there was degenerative disease present.

Defendant relies on Dr. McIntyre's report dated August 2 I, 2023 after an orthopedic

medical evaluation. Dr. McIntyre measured Plaintiffs range of motion using a hand-held

goniometer. He performed the Spurling's test, Foraminal compression test and the traction test

and they were all negativ~ for the cervical spine with normal range of motion. Reflexes were

present and symmetrical in the upper extremities. He performed the Clonus test and Laguere's

test which were both negative for the thoracic spine. He performed forward flexion, Laseque's

test, Kemig test and Waddell's test which were all negative along with the straight leg raising

which was also negative bilaterally to 90 degrees normal for the lumbosacral spine. The

Lachman' s, Anterior drawer, Valgus/varus, patellar apprehension, patellar Grind, .T-sign and

Murray tests were all negative for the right knee with no signs of instability and no atrophy. He

found that the alleged injury to the cervical spine, the alleged injury to the thoracic spine, the

alleged injury to the lumber spine and the alleged injury to the right knee were all resolved. [n his

opinion there was no evidence of disability or permanent injury, all orthopedic testing was

negative, reflexes, muscle strength, sensation and muscle tone were normal, and the Plaintiff was

able to perform activities of daily living and work duties without restrictions. He also found that

there was no need for any further orthopedic or physical therapy treatment.

159445/2017 BACON, Sl'SIE MAE vs. XPRESS TRANSPORT & MULTI Page 2 of7 Motion No. 005

2 of 7 [* 2] INDEX NO. 159445/2017

Defendant relies on Dr. Brower's report dated May 24, 2023 after a facial medical

evaluation. Dr. Brower found the scar above the right eyebrow as cosmetically acceptable with no

interference with activities of daily living.

Defendant relies on Dr. Scott Springer's review of the brain MRI examination which was

performed on November 27, 2017; right shoulder MRI examination performed on February 5,

2018 and left shoulder MRI examination performed on February 5, 2018. Dr. Springer compared

the Tl sagittal, axial Tl, T2 and FLAIR coronal T2 and axial diffusion weighted imaging provided

to the brain MRI of September 13, 2017 and found symmetric and normal sized ventricles and

sulci, no hydrocephalus, mass effect or midlinc shift. He found increased signal within the

periventricular white matter compatible with small vessel ischemic disease which he opined was

not related to trauma. Sellar regions, pineal regions, craniocervical junction and orbits were found

to be normal with no abnormality on the diffusion weighted images.

Dr. Springer reviewed sagittal, axial, and coronal images, examination was limited by

motion artifact on multiple images of multiple sequences on the left shoulder and right shoulder.

He found no fracture, dislocation, or acromioclavicular joint separation. There were degenerative

findings on both left and right shoulder typical of arthritis. Tendinosis related to repetitive motion

was found as well as degenerative changes to the glenohumeraljoint, small subchondral bone cysts

indicative chronic process of degenerative origins and not related to trauma were found in the right

shoulder. The left shoulder review found large subchondral bone cysts in the glenoid and small

subchondral bone cysts in the head of the humerus, degenerative and not related to trauma.

Further, Dr. Springer found no posttraumatic changes casually related to the June 16, 2017 accident

for the brain, left shoulder and right shoulder MRI review.

Finally, Defendant relies on Dr. Agrawal's report dated May 24, 2023 after a neurological

medical evaluation. Dr. Agrawal evaluated Plaintiffs range of motion with the use of a

159445/2017 BACON, Sl!SIE MAE vs. XPRESS TRANSPORT & l\UILTI PageJof7 :\lotion '.'io. 005

[* 3] 3 of 7 INDEX NO. 159445/2017

goniometer, visual inspection and self-demonstration and found normal range of motion of the

cervical spine. Foraminal compression, Spurling test and Soto Hall test were all negative. He

performed Laguere's test and clonus test which were both negative. He found normal range of

motion for the thoracic spine. He also found normal range of motion for the lumbar spine with

negative Lasegue's and Waddell's test. Dr. Agrawal noted normal muscle tone and muscle

strength of 5/5 along with normal position and vibration sense, in all four extremities.

Dr. Agrawal found alleged injury to the cervical spine, thoracic spine and lumber spine

resolved with normal neurological examination. He opined that there was no permanency and neck

and low back pain seemed to be due to degenerative joint disease and that the injury to the cervical

spine, thoracic spine and lumbar spine had resolved. He found that the Plaintiff had no disability

and was capable of doing basic and advanced activities of living. He also found that there was no

need for any further treatment at this time and that Plaintiff has reached maximum therapeutic

benefit.

Defendants have met their initial burden of establishing that Plaintiff did not sustain serious

injuries as a result of the accident under Insurance Law 5102( d) (Perez v Rodriguez, 25 AD3d 506

[1 st Dept 2006]) and shifted the burden of whether the Plaintiff has sustained serious injury.

In opposition, Plaintiff relied on the affirmation medical examination and review of testing

of Dr. Arie Hausknecht, certified medical records and unswom Magnetic Resonance Reports of

Dr. David Payne and Dr. Robert Waxman, the unswom reports of Dr. Demetrios Mikelis, Dr.

Sebastian Lattuga and Dr. Silvia Geraci and emergency room hospital records from Mount Sinai

Beth Israel. Dr. Hausknecht specifically addressed Dr. Springer's findings of degenerative disease

opining that the disc pathologies and nerve injuries, right shoulder tears and left knee internal

derangement did not pre-exist the accident and Plaintiff was previously asymptomatic.

15')-'45/2017 HACON, st;srn MAE vs. XPRESS TRANSPORT & MUL Tl .\lotion :'fo. 005 Page 4 of7

[* 4] 4 of 7 INDEX NO. 159445/2017

Dr. Robert Waxman reviewed the MRI of Plaintiffs right knee dated October 25, 2017.

Dr. Waxman reported that the MRI showed a macerated tear of the medial meniscus with severe

subarticular marrow edema, partial tear of the posterior cruciate ligament and the proximal medial

collateral ligament. Dr. David Payne reviewed the MRI dated September 30, 2017 of Plaintiffs

thoracic spine and noted right paracentral herniations at T9-l O and Tl 0-11 each with thecal sac

indentation. Dr. David Payne reviewed the MRI dated September 17. 2017 of Plaintiffs lumbar

spine and reported bulging disc at Ll/2, L2/3, L3/4, L4/5 and L/5/S1 with left lateral herniation

component impinging upon the exited L2 and near impingement on the exited L3 root, moderate

bony foraminal stenosis and mild bilateral foraminal stenosis, respectively. On the MRI of

Plaintiffs cervical spine dated September 17,201 7, Dr. Payne notes paracentral, central, foraminal

and central herniation at C2/3, C4/5 C 5/6, C6/7, C7 /TI, respectively.

The certified records from Prompt Medical has office visits with Dr. Demetrios Mikelis,

and Dr. Sebastian Lattuga on July 9, 2018, May 30, 2018, April 30, 2018, and October 9, 2018.

Plaintiff was seen by Dr. Silvia Geraci on October 9, 2018, September 4, 2018 and August 14,

2018. There was a surgical procedure on September 25, 2018 and July 31, 2018 after a pain

management consultation on July 17, 2018. Dr. Geraci performed a lumbar zygapophyseal joint

nerve block and 1st cervical epidural steroid injection. Dr. Arie Hausknecht's report dated April

13, 2023 noted that the Plaintiff was seen by him on September 7, 2017, he noted the evaluation

on October 12, 20 I 7, November 13. 2017 and April 11, 2018 after which she was seen by Dr.

Mikelis and his associates where she had cervical epidural steroid injection and underwent right

L3-4-5 facet blocks which gave temporary relief.

Dr. Hausknecht measured Plaintiffs range of motion with a handheld goniometer and

found abnormal ranges, T/L- S spine forward flexion 40 range (normal 90); left lateral flexion 12

range (normal 90) C spine extension 30 range (normal 60), forward flexion 40 range (normal 90).

159445/2017 BACO~, SllSIE MAE vs. XPRESS TRA~SPORT & MULTI !\1otion No. 005 Page S of7

5 of 7 [* 5] INDEX NO. 159445/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 89 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/15/2024

He reviewed Plaintiffs cervical spine MRI dated 9/15/2017 and reported C2-3 . CJ-4, CS-6, C6-

7 disc herniation with cord impingement and root impingement and C7-T 1 disc herniation. He

also noted that the MRI of the thoracic spine dated September 22, 2017 revealed T9-10 and TJ0-

1 I disc herniation. Dr. Hausknecht noted that an MRI of Plaintiffs lumbar spine dated September

15, 2017 revealed T 12-L L L 1-2, L4-5 and LS-S 1 disc bulge with L2-3 and LJ-4 disc herniation

which were all associated with hypertrophic changes. He noted post-concussion syndrome and

posttraumatic headache disorder and aggravation of previously asymptomatic underlying

degenerative joint disease. Dr. Hausknecht asserted with a reasonable degree of medical certainty

that the motor vehicle accident on June I 6, 2017 was the substantial cause of Plaintiffs condition

since the pre-existing degenerative joint disease was common for her age and she was previously

asymptomatic. He also noted with a reasonable degree of medical certainty that Plaintiff had

sustained significant limitation of function of her neurological and musculoskeletal system.

Plaintiffs treating physician adequately addressed the evidence of and explained that

Plaintiff was previously asymptomatic and that he believed the accident caused Plaintiffs injuries.

As there are conflicting medical reports as to limitations on Plaintiff's ranges of motion and

causation, there exists an issue of fact precluding summary judgment (see Ly Giap v. Hathi Son

Pham, I 59 A D3d [1" 1 Dept. 2018]; see Duran v Kabir, 93 AD3d 566 [JS' Dept 2012]).

With respect to the 90/180 days category of serious injury, Dr. Hausknecht reported

permanency of Plaintiff's injury and limitation which is competent evidence that Plaintiff is still

unable to perform substantially all of her normal activities and was not able to perform her

activities for at least 90 days of the first 180 days as a result of the accident. Plaintiff testified in

her examination before trial that she is retired but is now unable to cook, wash her clothes, make

her bed, mop her floor, and needs help to do these things and that she now has to wear prescription

glasses. She notes that she has pain in her head, back, legs and neck. Plaintiff also testified that

159445/2017 BACON, SllSIE MAE vs. XPRESS TRANSPORT & Ml!LTl Page 6 of7 '.\lotion 'l'o. 005

[* 6] 6 of 7 INDEX NO. 159445/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 89 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/15/2024

she now uses her daughter as an aide. Plaintiffs testimony as to her restrictions in conjunction

with Dr. Hausknecht' s report has raised an issue of fact as to the 90/180 days category as well.

Accordingly, it is,

ORDERED that the motion by Defendants XPRESS TRANSPORT & MULTI

SERVICES INC and JOSE BELTRE for summary judgment on the grounds that Plaintiffs alleged

injuries fail to satisfy the serious injury threshold under Insurance Law 5102 (d) is denied; and it

is further

ORDERED that any requested relief not specifically addressed herein has nonetheless

been considered; and it is further

ORDERED that within 30 days of Entry, Plaintiffs shall serve a copy of this Decision and

Order upon the Defendant with Notice of Entry.

This constitutes the Decision and Order of the Court.

10/15/2024 DATE

~ CHECK ONE: CASE l)JSPQSED NON-FINAL DISPOSITION

GRANTED 0 DENIED GRANTED IN PART □ OTHER APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: 11\"CUIDES TRA'.'ISFF.R/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT □ REFERENCE

159445/2017 BACO:\', Sl'.SJE MAE ~·s. XPRESS TRANSPORT & MULTI Motion Nn. 005 Page 7 of 7

[* 7] 7 of 7