Bacon v. Warner

1 Root 349
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided January 15, 1792·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment of the court — That the answer is sufficient, and that the petitioners take nothing by their petition.

First, because said debt was subject to the same equity in the hands of the assignees, the petitioners, as it was in the hands of Grey. This is a settled principle in equity; except, in favor of commerce, the case of bills of exchange and negotiable notes.

Secondly, Warner being an officer, is not liable to the petitioners in equity for money which he had not collected, on the ground of a nonfeasance, from which he was legally and fairly discharged without any fraud in him.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bacon v. Warner, 1 Root 349 (Colo. 1792).

1 Root 349 (Bacon v. Warner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New Bedford Acceptance Corp. v. Universal Auto Co.
1 Conn. Supp. 160 (Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, 1935)
New Bedford Acceptance Corp. v. Universal Auto Co.
1 Conn. Super. Ct. 160 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1935)