Bacon v. Texas Liquor Control Board

106 S.W.2d 382, 1937 Tex. App. LEXIS 567
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 4, 1937
DocketNo. 13701.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 106 S.W.2d 382 (Bacon v. Texas Liquor Control Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bacon v. Texas Liquor Control Board, 106 S.W.2d 382, 1937 Tex. App. LEXIS 567 (Tex. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

BROWN, Justice.

We doubt that, under the provisions of the Liquor Law, there is any right of appeal after a trial on the merits in the district court; we are convinced that the right to supersede the judgment of the district court, after a liquor permit is canceled, is denied by the Liquor Act (Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 666 — 1 et seq.). Victor Mayhew v. A. J. Power, District Judge, decided by this court April 9, 1937, and reported in 104 S.W.(2d) 642.

Appellee’s motion is granted, and the order of the trial court granting appellant a supersedeas, together with the supersedeas bond, are set aside and held for naught.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Peppermint Lounge v. Texas Liquor Control Board
411 S.W.2d 745 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1967)
Texas Liquor Control Board v. Abogado
172 S.W.2d 778 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1943)
Hallum v. Texas Liquor Control Board
166 S.W.2d 175 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 S.W.2d 382, 1937 Tex. App. LEXIS 567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bacon-v-texas-liquor-control-board-texapp-1937.