Bacon v. Texas Liquor Control Board
This text of 106 S.W.2d 382 (Bacon v. Texas Liquor Control Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We doubt that, under the provisions of the Liquor Law, there is any right of appeal after a trial on the merits in the district court; we are convinced that the right to supersede the judgment of the district court, after a liquor permit is canceled, is denied by the Liquor Act (Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 666 — 1 et seq.). Victor Mayhew v. A. J. Power, District Judge, decided by this court April 9, 1937, and reported in 104 S.W.(2d) 642.
Appellee’s motion is granted, and the order of the trial court granting appellant a supersedeas, together with the supersedeas bond, are set aside and held for naught.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
106 S.W.2d 382, 1937 Tex. App. LEXIS 567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bacon-v-texas-liquor-control-board-texapp-1937.