Bacon v. Texas Liquor Control Board

Court of Appeals of Texas

Bacon v. Texas Liquor Control Board

106 S.W.2d 382, 1937 Tex. App. LEXIS 567

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 4, 1937·No. No. 13701.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

BROWN, Justice.

We doubt that, under the provisions of the Liquor Law, there is any right of appeal after a trial on the merits in the district court; we are convinced that the right to supersede the judgment of the district court, after a liquor permit is canceled, is denied by the Liquor Act (Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 666 — 1 et seq.). Victor Mayhew v. A. J. Power, District Judge, decided by this court April 9, 1937, and reported in 104 S.W.(2d) 642.

Appellee’s motion is granted, and the order of the trial court granting appellant a supersedeas, together with the supersedeas bond, are set aside and held for naught.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BROWN, Justice.

We doubt that, under the provisions of the Liquor Law, there is any right of appeal after a trial on the merits in the district court; we are convinced that the right to supersede the judgment of the district court, after a liquor permit is canceled, is denied by the Liquor Act (Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 666 — 1 et seq.). Victor Mayhew v. A. J. Power, District Judge, decided by this court April 9, 1937, and reported in 104 S.W.(2d) 642.

Appellee’s motion is granted, and the order of the trial court granting appellant a supersedeas, together with the supersedeas bond, are set aside and held for naught.

Bacon v. Texas Liquor Control Board, 106 S.W.2d 382, 1937 Tex. App. LEXIS 567 (Tex. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

106 S.W.2d 382 (Bacon v. Texas Liquor Control Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related