Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bacon v. State

Bacon v. State

672 So. 2d 658, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4576, 1996 WL 210903
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 1, 1996
DocketNo. 95-1190
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 672 So. 2d 658 (Bacon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bacon v. State, 672 So. 2d 658, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4576, 1996 WL 210903 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant and codefendants Algie Knight and Calvin Williams were convicted of trafficking in heroin. Appellant argues that the prosecutor’s remarks in closing warrant a new trial. In Knight v. State, 672 So.2d 590 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), we addressed the same issue and held that the prosecutor’s improper comments mandated a new trial. Accordingly, we reverse and remand this case for a new trial.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DELL, POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. State
677 So. 2d 113 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
672 So. 2d 658, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4576, 1996 WL 210903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bacon-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.