Bacon v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security Division

Indiana Court of Appeals

Bacon v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security Division

119 N.E.2d 438, 124 Ind. App. 503, 1954 Ind. App. LEXIS 191

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 17, 1954

DocketNo. 18,558

StatusPublished

This text of 119 N.E.2d 438 (Bacon v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bacon v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security Division, 119 N.E.2d 438, 124 Ind. App. 503, 1954 Ind. App. LEXIS 191 (Ind. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have before us an unsigned brief of four pages which, from its contents, we assume was filed by the appellant or in his behalf. It contains no assignment of errors and the statement of the issues is indefinite and uncertain to the extent that we can only surmise what question was involved in the hearing before the Review Board. The decision of the board is not set out and all we are told concerning it is that [504]*504it is in favor of the appellant’s employer. The brief contains no narrative recital of the evidence but in lieu thereof we are referred to various pages and lines of the transcript where the appellant concludes certain facts are established. No argument whatever is made as contemplated by Rule 2-17 (e) and nowhere in the brief is a proposition stated or an authority cited.

By reason of the total inadequacy of the brief to present any question whatever for review the decision of the Review Board is affirmed.

Note. — Reported in 119 N. E. 2d 438.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We have before us an unsigned brief of four pages which, from its contents, we assume was filed by the appellant or in his behalf. It contains no assignment of errors and the statement of the issues is indefinite and uncertain to the extent that we can only surmise what question was involved in the hearing before the Review Board. The decision of the board is not set out and all we are told concerning it is that [504]*504it is in favor of the appellant’s employer. The brief contains no narrative recital of the evidence but in lieu thereof we are referred to various pages and lines of the transcript where the appellant concludes certain facts are established. No argument whatever is made as contemplated by Rule 2-17 (e) and nowhere in the brief is a proposition stated or an authority cited.

By reason of the total inadequacy of the brief to present any question whatever for review the decision of the Review Board is affirmed.

Note. — Reported in 119 N. E. 2d 438.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 N.E.2d 438, 124 Ind. App. 503, 1954 Ind. App. LEXIS 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bacon-v-review-board-of-indiana-employment-security-division-indctapp-1954.