Bacon v. Merchants

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 14, 2008
Docket08-6514
StatusUnpublished

This text of Bacon v. Merchants (Bacon v. Merchants) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bacon v. Merchants, (4th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6514

DWAYNE DION BACON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SERGEANT MERCHANTS; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:07-cv-02033-AW)

Submitted: October 20, 2008 Decided: November 14, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dwayne Dion Bacon, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole C. Gatewood, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Dwayne Dion Bacon appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Bacon v. Merchants, No. 8:07-cv-02033-AW (D. Md.

Mar. 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Bacon v. Merchants, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bacon-v-merchants-ca4-2008.