Bacon v. Merchants
This text of Bacon v. Merchants (Bacon v. Merchants) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6514
DWAYNE DION BACON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SERGEANT MERCHANTS; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:07-cv-02033-AW)
Submitted: October 20, 2008 Decided: November 14, 2008
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dwayne Dion Bacon, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole C. Gatewood, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Dwayne Dion Bacon appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Bacon v. Merchants, No. 8:07-cv-02033-AW (D. Md.
Mar. 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bacon v. Merchants, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bacon-v-merchants-ca4-2008.