Bacon v. Magee
This text of 7 Cow. 515 (Bacon v. Magee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We are not aware of any precedent for such a rule, though there must have been frequent occasion for it. The uniform course, in relation to those summary applications, has been to trust to voluntary affidavits; and the want of a power to coerce them has often been urged *in argument, without contradiction, as a defect in this kind of proceeding. We do not think that we have power to make the rule applied for.
Motion for perpetual stay, &c., granted.
The only means, therefore, under the present practice, to coerce evi-
[516]*516deuce on a non-enoneratecl matter, would seem to be, to apply to the court for a feigned issue; on the trial of which the witness may be compelled to attend upon subpoena.
Under the N. Y. Code, within three years : “ An action against a sherif^ coroner, or constable, upon the liability incurred by the doing of an act in his official capacity, and in virtue of his office, or by the omission of an official duty; including the non-payment of money collected upon an execution, But this section shall not apply to an action for an escape. An action upon a statute, for a penalty or forfeiture, where the action is given to the party aggrieved, or to such party and the people of this state, except where the statute imposing it prescribes a different limitation.” (N. Y. Code, ch. 3, sec. 72.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 Cow. 515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bacon-v-magee-nysupct-1827.