Bacon v. Lamb

Supreme Court of Colorado

Bacon v. Lamb

4 Colo. 474

CourtSupreme Court of Colorado

DecidedDecember 15, 1878

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 4 Colo. 474 (Bacon v. Lamb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bacon v. Lamb, 4 Colo. 474 (Colo. 1878).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The grounds assigned for the dismissal of this appeal are not good. The filing of the notice of appeal and service were on the same day, and are presumed to have been cotemporaneous. It is not necessary that the notice of appeal should state the grounds of appeal. Under section 197 of the Code, where a case has been tried to the court, and the decision is not made immediately after the closing of the testimony, it is deemed excepted to for the purpose of review on appeal.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The grounds assigned for the dismissal of this appeal are not good. The filing of the notice of appeal and service were on the same day, and are presumed to have been cotemporaneous. It is not necessary that the notice of appeal should state the grounds of appeal. Under section 197 of the Code, where a case has been tried to the court, and the decision is not made immediately after the closing of the testimony, it is deemed excepted to for the purpose of review on appeal.

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Colo. 474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bacon-v-lamb-colo-1878.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack