Bacon v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
This text of 21 F. App'x 170 (Bacon v. Federal Bureau of Prisons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Roscoe Bacon appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bacon v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. CA-00-545-6 (D.S.C. Mar. 22, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court *171 and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 F. App'x 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bacon-v-federal-bureau-of-prisons-ca4-2001.