Bacon v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Fourth Circuit

Bacon v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

21 F. App'x 170

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 25, 2001·No. 01-6794·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Roscoe Bacon appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bacon v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. CA-00-545-6 (D.S.C. Mar. 22, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court *171 and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Roscoe Bacon appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bacon v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. CA-00-545-6 (D.S.C. Mar. 22, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court *171 and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Bacon v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 21 F. App'x 170 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

21 F. App'x 170 (Bacon v. Federal Bureau of Prisons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related