Bacon v. Bacon

536 So. 2d 1080, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2467, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4848, 1988 WL 117556
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 9, 1988
DocketNo. 88-1863
StatusPublished

This text of 536 So. 2d 1080 (Bacon v. Bacon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bacon v. Bacon, 536 So. 2d 1080, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2467, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4848, 1988 WL 117556 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of an order denying her motion to change the supervisor of appellee’s restricted visitation with their children. We affirm and hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion as presented. We note that appellant is not without a remedy to seek a modification of the visitation provisions in the final judgment. See Johnson v. Johnson, 455 So.2d 1332 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); [1081]*1081Giachetti v. Giachetti, 416 So.2d 27 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

AFFIRMED.

HERSEY, C.J., and DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Giachetti v. Giachetti
416 So. 2d 27 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Johnson v. Johnson
455 So. 2d 1332 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
536 So. 2d 1080, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2467, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4848, 1988 WL 117556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bacon-v-bacon-fladistctapp-1988.