Bacon v. Bacon
This text of 536 So. 2d 1080 (Bacon v. Bacon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant seeks reversal of an order denying her motion to change the supervisor of appellee’s restricted visitation with their children. We affirm and hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion as presented. We note that appellant is not without a remedy to seek a modification of the visitation provisions in the final judgment. See Johnson v. Johnson, 455 So.2d 1332 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); [1081]*1081Giachetti v. Giachetti, 416 So.2d 27 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
536 So. 2d 1080, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2467, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4848, 1988 WL 117556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bacon-v-bacon-fladistctapp-1988.