Bacon v. Bacon

507 So. 2d 1153, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1234, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8226
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 12, 1987
DocketNo. 86-1089
StatusPublished

This text of 507 So. 2d 1153 (Bacon v. Bacon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bacon v. Bacon, 507 So. 2d 1153, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1234, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8226 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court reformed the parties’ property settlement agreement to reflect their true intent. We reject appellant’s contention that Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540 precluded the trial court from reforming the agreement. See Gobelman v. Gobelman, 303 So.2d 646 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), cert. denied, 316 So.2d 561 (1975); see also Sheffield v. Barry, 153 Fla. 144, 14 So.2d 417 (1943); Dagnino v. Home Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 183 So.2d 846, 849 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 188 So.2d 821 (Fla.1966). Appellant’s remaining point lacks merit. Accordingly, we affirm.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sheffield v. Barry
14 So. 2d 417 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1943)
Dagnino v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
183 So. 2d 846 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Gobelman v. Gobelman
303 So. 2d 646 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
507 So. 2d 1153, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1234, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bacon-v-bacon-fladistctapp-1987.