Bacon v. Bacon

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bacon v. Bacon

507 So. 2d 1153, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1234, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8226

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 12, 1987·No. No. 86-1089·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court reformed the parties’ property settlement agreement to reflect their true intent. We reject appellant’s contention that Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540 precluded the trial court from reforming the agreement. See Gobelman v. Gobelman, 303 So.2d 646 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), cert. denied, 316 So.2d 561 (1975); see also Sheffield v. Barry, 153 Fla. 144, 14 So.2d 417 (1943); Dagnino v. Home Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 183 So.2d 846, 849 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 188 So.2d 821 (Fla.1966). Appellant’s remaining point lacks merit. Accordingly, we affirm.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court reformed the parties’ property settlement agreement to reflect their true intent. We reject appellant’s contention that Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540 precluded the trial court from reforming the agreement. See Gobelman v. Gobelman, 303 So.2d 646 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), cert. denied, 316 So.2d 561 (1975); see also Sheffield v. Barry, 153 Fla. 144, 14 So.2d 417 (1943); Dagnino v. Home Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 183 So.2d 846, 849 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 188 So.2d 821 (Fla.1966). Appellant’s remaining point lacks merit. Accordingly, we affirm.

Affirmed.

Bacon v. Bacon, 507 So. 2d 1153, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1234, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8226 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

507 So. 2d 1153 (Bacon v. Bacon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related