Bacon Service Corp. v. Huss

275 U.S. 507
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 12, 1927·No. No. 127·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The writ of error is dismissed on the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code as amended by the act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937),.for lack of jurisdiction. Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. City of Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5, 6. Treating the wfit of error as an application for certiorari, the certiorari is denied for want of a [508]*508substantial Federal question on the authority of Schmolke v. O’Brien, Chief of Police, 273 U. S. 646; Dorchy v. Kansas, 272 U. S. 306, 308; Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Town of Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668, 671.

Messrs. Jeremiah F, Sullivan and Theodore M. Stuart for plaintiff in error. Messrs. U. S. Webb and Frank L. Guerena for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bacon Service Corp. v. Huss, 275 U.S. 507 (1927).

275 U.S. 507 (Bacon Service Corp. v. Huss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Farrell v. O'Brien
199 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Padgett
236 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Toop v. Ulysses Land Co.
237 U.S. 580 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. City of Carrollton
252 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1920)
Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Town of Graham
253 U.S. 193 (Supreme Court, 1920)
Dorchy v. Kansas
272 U.S. 306 (Supreme Court, 1926)
Schmolke v. O'Brien
273 U.S. 646 (Supreme Court, 1926)