Bacon & Matheson Forge Co. v. United States

267 U.S. 585, 45 S. Ct. 461, 69 L. Ed. 800, 1925 U.S. LEXIS 433
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 16, 1925·No. No. 196·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed upon the authority of Hill v. United States, 149 U. S. 593, 598; Tempel v. United States, 248 U. S. 121, 130; Horstman Co. v. United States, 257 U. S. 138, 146; Klebe v. United States, 263 U. S. 188, 191; Pearson v. United States, ante, p. 000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bacon & Matheson Forge Co. v. United States, 267 U.S. 585, 45 S. Ct. 461, 69 L. Ed. 800, 1925 U.S. LEXIS 433 (1925).

267 U.S. 585 (Bacon & Matheson Forge Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rodrigue v. Copeland
465 So. 2d 67 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1985)
Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board
453 A.2d 367 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)
United States v. Exxon Corp.
628 F.2d 70 (D.C. Circuit, 1980)
Palmer v. Fitzpatrick
557 P.2d 203 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1976)
A. O. Smith Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission
396 F. Supp. 1108 (D. Delaware, 1975)
United States v. Zack
375 F. Supp. 825 (D. Nevada, 1974)
In Re Andrews' Tax Liability
18 F. Supp. 804 (D. Maryland, 1937)
Federal Trade Commission v. Smith
34 F.2d 323 (S.D. New York, 1929)
Cudahy Packing Co. v. United States
15 F.2d 133 (Seventh Circuit, 1926)