Backus & Whiting v. Rogers
8 Johns. 346
This text of 8 Johns. 346 (Backus & Whiting v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Backus & Whiting v. Rogers, 8 Johns. 346 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1811).
Opinion
When a bill is to be served on an attorne7 as a defendant, it is in the nature of process, and must be served on him personally, or by some other service, which the court may, under the circumstances of the case, regard as equivalent to a personal service. • The motion must, therefore, be granted.
Motion' granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Fenner v. Tucker
6 R.I. 551 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1860)
Piatt v. Oliver
19 F. Cas. 550 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio, 1840)
Carrington v. Caller
2 Stew. 175 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1829)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
8 Johns. 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/backus-whiting-v-rogers-nysupct-1811.