Backus & Whiting v. Rogers

8 Johns. 346
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1811·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

When a bill is to be served on an attorne7 as a defendant, it is in the nature of process, and must be served on him personally, or by some other service, which the court may, under the circumstances of the case, regard as equivalent to a personal service. • The motion must, therefore, be granted.

Motion' granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Backus & Whiting v. Rogers, 8 Johns. 346 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1811).

8 Johns. 346 (Backus & Whiting v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fenner v. Tucker
6 R.I. 551 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1860)
Piatt v. Oliver
19 F. Cas. 550 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio, 1840)
Carrington v. Caller
2 Stew. 175 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1829)