Backus v. Smith
3 Cow. 344
This text of 3 Cow. 344 (Backus v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Backus v. Smith, 3 Cow. 344 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1824).
Opinion
The settled practice is otherwise. You substitute one referee for any one named in the notice; and the mover may substitute some other person for the one against whom cause is shewn. The mover is always entitled to the nomination of two referees.
Livingston, then nominated; and,
Per totam Curiam—-
Rule accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 Cow. 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/backus-v-smith-nysupct-1824.