Backus Et Vir. v. General Public Utilities Company

188 So. 766, 138 Fla. 1
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 5, 1939
StatusPublished

This text of 188 So. 766 (Backus Et Vir. v. General Public Utilities Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Backus Et Vir. v. General Public Utilities Company, 188 So. 766, 138 Fla. 1 (Fla. 1939).

Opinion

Per Curiam. —

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Terrell, Mr. Justice Buford and Mr. Justice Chapman are of the opinion that the judgment of the Circuit Court should be reversed while Mr. Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Thomas are of the opinion that the said judgment should be affirmed. When the members of the *2 Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the judgment should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State, ex rel. Hampton vs. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the judgment of the Circuit Court in this case be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Brown, Buford, Chapman and Ti-iomas, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 So. 766, 138 Fla. 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/backus-et-vir-v-general-public-utilities-company-fla-1939.