Backfisch v. Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P.

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri
DecidedNovember 20, 2024
Docket1:24-cv-00213
StatusUnknown

This text of Backfisch v. Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. (Backfisch v. Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Backfisch v. Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P., (E.D. Mo. 2024).

Opinion

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION

BREANNA BACKFISCH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 1:24-CV-213 SNLJ ) PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO, L.P., ) et al., ) ) Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on review of the file following assignment to the undersigned. The Eight Circuit has admonished district courts to “be attentive to a satisfaction of jurisdictional requirements in all cases.” Sanders v. Clemco Indus., 823 F.2d 214, 216 (8th Cir. 1987). “In every federal case the court must be satisfied that it has jurisdiction before it turns to the merits of other legal arguments.” Carlson v. Arrowhead Concrete Works, Inc., 445 F.3d 1046, 1050 (8th Cir. 2006). “A plaintiff who seeks to invoke diversity jurisdiction of the federal courts must plead citizenship distinctly and affirmatively.” 15 James Wm. Moore, et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 102.31 (3d ed. 2010). The Complaint [Doc. 1] asserts that the Court has jurisdiction over the action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because the lawsuit is between citizens of different States. The Complaint also seeks damages in excess of $75,000. However, the defendants include a Delaware Limited Partnership, Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P.. The Complaint alleges that defendant’s principal place of business is in Pennsylvania and that Penske is thus a citizen of Delaware and Pennsylvania. The Eighth Circuit has held that limited liability companies and limited partnerships are citizens of every state of which any member is a citizen. See GMAC Commercial Credit, LLC v. Dillard Dep’t Stores, Inc., 357 F.3d 827, 829 (8th Cir. 2004). Plaintiff has apparently addressed defendant’s citizenship like that of a corporation, not a limited partnership, and thus it has not alleged defendant Penske’s citizenship adequately.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, by December 10, 2024, plaintiff shall file an amended complaint which shall allege facts establishing the citizenship of each of defendant Penske’s members. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff does not timely and fully comply with this order, this matter will be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other proceedings in this case are STAYED pending further order of this Court. Dated this _20th_ day of November, 2024.

STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH,JIR. * SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Backfisch v. Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/backfisch-v-penske-truck-leasing-co-lp-moed-2024.