Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Backenstos v. Holmes

Backenstos v. Holmes

183 A.D. 908
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1918·Published

Opinion

No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Putnam and Kelly, JJ., concurred; Blaekmar, J., dissented upon the ground that the judgment cannot be affirmed without overruling the ease of Patterson v. Youngs (154 App. Div. 536).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Backenstos v. Holmes, 183 A.D. 908 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1918).

183 A.D. 908 (Backenstos v. Holmes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Patterson v. Youngs
154 A.D. 536 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)