Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Back v. State

Back v. State

412 So. 2d 916, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 29206
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 14, 1982·No. No. 81-1009·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, having failed to. do so at trial, seeks to raise for the first time on appeal the issue of the lack of evidence of intent to commit theft. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380(b); Patterson v. State, 391 So.2d 344 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); De La Cova v. State, 355 So.2d 1227 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). We affirm.

ANSTEAD, HERSEY and GLICK-STEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Back v. State, 412 So. 2d 916, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 29206 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

412 So. 2d 916 (Back v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Patterson v. State
391 So. 2d 344 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
De La Cova v. State
355 So. 2d 1227 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)