Back v. State

412 So. 2d 916, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 29206
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 14, 1982
DocketNo. 81-1009
StatusPublished

This text of 412 So. 2d 916 (Back v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Back v. State, 412 So. 2d 916, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 29206 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, having failed to. do so at trial, seeks to raise for the first time on appeal the issue of the lack of evidence of intent to commit theft. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380(b); Patterson v. State, 391 So.2d 344 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); De La Cova v. State, 355 So.2d 1227 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). We affirm.

ANSTEAD, HERSEY and GLICK-STEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Patterson v. State
391 So. 2d 344 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
De La Cova v. State
355 So. 2d 1227 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
412 So. 2d 916, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 29206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/back-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.