Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Back v. First Solotwiner Sick Benefit Society

Back v. First Solotwiner Sick Benefit Society

155 Misc. 585, 280 N.Y.S. 107, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1201
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedMay 21, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 155 Misc. 585 (Back v. First Solotwiner Sick Benefit Society) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Back v. First Solotwiner Sick Benefit Society, 155 Misc. 585, 280 N.Y.S. 107, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1201 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

More than twenty days having elapsed after due entry of judgment and service of notice thereof, defendant was not entitled to an amendment or modification of judgment under section 129 of the Municipal Court Code. In addition the modification or amendment sought was not a correction for error of form or substance shown in the record itself. (Frost v. City of New York, 177 N. Y. Supp. 220.)

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion denied.

All concur; present, Hammer, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Petrides v. Park Hill Restaurant, Inc.
265 A.D. 509 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 Misc. 585, 280 N.Y.S. 107, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/back-v-first-solotwiner-sick-benefit-society-nyappterm-1935.