Back v. First Solotwiner Sick Benefit Society
155 Misc. 585, 280 N.Y.S. 107, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1201
Opinion
More than twenty days having elapsed after due entry of judgment and service of notice thereof, defendant was not entitled to an amendment or modification of judgment under section 129 of the Municipal Court Code. In addition the modification or amendment sought was not a correction for error of form or substance shown in the record itself. (Frost v. City of New York, 177 N. Y. Supp. 220.)
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion denied.
All concur; present, Hammer, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Back v. First Solotwiner Sick Benefit Society, 155 Misc. 585, 280 N.Y.S. 107, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1201 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).
155 Misc. 585 (Back v. First Solotwiner Sick Benefit Society) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Petrides v. Park Hill Restaurant, Inc.
265 A.D. 509 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943)