Back in Motion Chiropractic Dc Pllc v. Westfield Insurance Company
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
March 3, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
159658 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem
Stephen J. Markman
Brian K. Zahra
BACK IN MOTION CHIROPRACTIC, DC, Richard H. Bernstein PLLC, Elizabeth T. Clement Plaintiff-Appellee, Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices
v SC: 159658 COA: 341791 Wayne CC: 17-006488-NF
WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 16, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
March 3, 2020
a0224
Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Back in Motion Chiropractic Dc Pllc v. Westfield Insurance Company (Back in Motion Chiropractic Dc Pllc v. Westfield Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.