Back in Motion Chiropractic Dc Pllc v. Westfield Insurance Company
This text of Back in Motion Chiropractic Dc Pllc v. Westfield Insurance Company (Back in Motion Chiropractic Dc Pllc v. Westfield Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
March 3, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
159658 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem
Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra BACK IN MOTION CHIROPRACTIC, DC, Richard H. Bernstein PLLC, Elizabeth T. Clement Plaintiff-Appellee, Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices
v SC: 159658 COA: 341791 Wayne CC: 17-006488-NF WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 16, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. March 3, 2020 a0224 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Back in Motion Chiropractic Dc Pllc v. Westfield Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/back-in-motion-chiropractic-dc-pllc-v-westfield-insurance-company-mich-2020.