Bachman v. Gross

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Bachman v. Gross

24 A. 712, 150 Pa. 516, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 1354

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 13, 1892

DocketAppeal, No. 159

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 24 A. 712 (Bachman v. Gross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bachman v. Gross, 24 A. 712, 150 Pa. 516, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 1354 (Pa. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This was an ejectment in the court below. The only speci- . fication of error is that the court imposed full costs, the de[517]*517fendants not having filed a disclaimer. The ruling of the court below is so clearly right, and the appeal itself of such a trifling nature, that we not only affirm the judgment, but also impose the penalty of $20 counsel fee, provided by the act of assembly for frivolous appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

This was an ejectment in the court below. The only speci- . fication of error is that the court imposed full costs, the de[517]*517fendants not having filed a disclaimer. The ruling of the court below is so clearly right, and the appeal itself of such a trifling nature, that we not only affirm the judgment, but also impose the penalty of $20 counsel fee, provided by the act of assembly for frivolous appeals.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A. 712, 150 Pa. 516, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 1354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bachman-v-gross-pa-1892.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack