Bachman v. Bachman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bachman v. Bachman

611 So. 2d 1375, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1723, 1993 WL 30588

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 10, 1993

DocketNo. 91-2915

StatusPublished

This text of 611 So. 2d 1375 (Bachman v. Bachman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bachman v. Bachman, 611 So. 2d 1375, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1723, 1993 WL 30588 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse that portion of the final judgment of dissolution directing that the marital residence be sold. It is clear from even the limited record before us that there is no evidence or finding supporting that aspect of the final judgment. We remand for the final judgment to be amended to provide that Appellant is to have the use and possession of the home until the minor child of the parties reaches majority or the child is otherwise emancipated. Cruz v. Cruz, 574 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Kanouse v. Kanouse, 549 So.2d 1035 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Neustein v. Neustein, 503 So.2d 439 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Pino v. Pino, 418 So.2d 311 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). In all other respects the final judgment is affirmed. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1980).

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse that portion of the final judgment of dissolution directing that the marital residence be sold. It is clear from even the limited record before us that there is no evidence or finding supporting that aspect of the final judgment. We remand for the final judgment to be amended to provide that Appellant is to have the use and possession of the home until the minor child of the parties reaches majority or the child is otherwise emancipated. Cruz v. Cruz, 574 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Kanouse v. Kanouse, 549 So.2d 1035 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Neustein v. Neustein, 503 So.2d 439 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Pino v. Pino, 418 So.2d 311 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). In all other respects the final judgment is affirmed. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1980).

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

611 So. 2d 1375, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1723, 1993 WL 30588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bachman-v-bachman-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack