Bachiller v. State

589 So. 2d 472, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12809, 1991 WL 259254
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 10, 1991·No. No. 91-1296·Published

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The State correctly concedes that the trial court erred in imposing consecutive sentences on the defendant which resulted in a total prison sentence twice that authorized [473]*473by the guidelines maximum penalty. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for re-sentencing within the guidelines. See Young v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989); Johnson v. State, 578 So.2d 435 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Irizarry v. State, 578 So.2d 711 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bachiller v. State, 589 So. 2d 472, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12809, 1991 WL 259254 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

589 So. 2d 472 (Bachiller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Irizarry v. State
578 So. 2d 711 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Lambert v. State
545 So. 2d 838 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Johnson v. State
578 So. 2d 435 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)