Bachiller v. State

589 So. 2d 472, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12809, 1991 WL 259254
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 10, 1991
DocketNo. 91-1296
StatusPublished

This text of 589 So. 2d 472 (Bachiller v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bachiller v. State, 589 So. 2d 472, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12809, 1991 WL 259254 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The State correctly concedes that the trial court erred in imposing consecutive sentences on the defendant which resulted in a total prison sentence twice that authorized [473]*473by the guidelines maximum penalty. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for re-sentencing within the guidelines. See Young v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989); Johnson v. State, 578 So.2d 435 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Irizarry v. State, 578 So.2d 711 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Irizarry v. State
578 So. 2d 711 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Lambert v. State
545 So. 2d 838 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Johnson v. State
578 So. 2d 435 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
589 So. 2d 472, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12809, 1991 WL 259254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bachiller-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.