Bacher v. Albert

141 So. 5, 174 La. 388, 1932 La. LEXIS 1672
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bacher v. Albert. Read the opinion of the Court — 180 La. 108
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 1, 1932·No. No. 31269.·Published

Opinion

ROGERS, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his suit on an exception of no cause of action.

The defendants in this case are the same as the defendants in the case of Charles Wirth, Sr., v. A. Albert et al. (La. Sup.) 141 So. 1, 1 this day decided; and, except as to the party plaintiff, the amount involved, and the numbers of the interim certificates, the cases are identical. What we said in affirming the judgment in the other case is equally applicable to the present case.

For the reasons assigned in Wirth v. Albert, supra, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

1

174 La. 374.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bacher v. Albert, 141 So. 5, 174 La. 388, 1932 La. LEXIS 1672 (La. 1932).

141 So. 5 (Bacher v. Albert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wirth v. Albert
141 So. 1 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1932)