Bacher v. Albert

141 So. 5, 174 La. 388, 1932 La. LEXIS 1672
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedFebruary 1, 1932
DocketNo. 31269.
StatusPublished

This text of 141 So. 5 (Bacher v. Albert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bacher v. Albert, 141 So. 5, 174 La. 388, 1932 La. LEXIS 1672 (La. 1932).

Opinion

ROGERS, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his suit on an exception of no cause of action.

The defendants in this case are the same as the defendants in the case of Charles Wirth, Sr., v. A. Albert et al. (La. Sup.) 141 So. 1, 1 this day decided; and, except as to the party plaintiff, the amount involved, and the numbers of the interim certificates, the cases are identical. What we said in affirming the judgment in the other case is equally applicable to the present case.

For the reasons assigned in Wirth v. Albert, supra, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

1

174 La. 374.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wirth v. Albert
141 So. 1 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
141 So. 5, 174 La. 388, 1932 La. LEXIS 1672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bacher-v-albert-la-1932.