Bachelor v. State

81 So. 185, 16 Ala. App. 665, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 18
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 14, 1919
Docket5 Div. 297.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 81 So. 185 (Bachelor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bachelor v. State, 81 So. 185, 16 Ala. App. 665, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 18 (Ala. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

BROWN, P. J.

The defendant’s plea, setting up the pendency of a prosecution in the county court instituted, before the commencement of this prosecution, is in proper form, and embodies all the averments required by the statute (Code 1907, § 7571), and the court committed reversible error in striking the plea from the files on the motion of the solicitor. Code 1907, § 7570; Sherrod v. State, 14 Ala. App. 57, 71 South. 76; Gustin v. State, 10 Ala. App. 171, 65 South. 302; Moore v. State, 71 Ala. 307.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whitaker v. State
105 So. 433 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 So. 185, 16 Ala. App. 665, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bachelor-v-state-alactapp-1919.