Bache v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Bache v. United States

122 F.2d 201, 74 App. D.C. 174, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2937

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJune 2, 1941

DocketNo. 7600

StatusPublished

This text of 122 F.2d 201 (Bache v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bache v. United States, 122 F.2d 201, 74 App. D.C. 174, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2937 (D.C. Cir. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted in the court below of robbery and sentenced to three to ten years’ confinement. The District Court appointed James R. Kirkland, Esq., an experienced counselor at this bar, to represent appellant on this appeal.

We have gone carefully over the record, and we find that the so-called bill of exceptions contains no exceptions taken to any ruling of the court in the trial, and an examination of-the bill satisfies us-the trial was in all respects fair. Mr. Kirkland, after laborious work to discover some proper ground on which to urge a reversal, has frankly stated that his conclusion is that there is nothing for this court now to review. The judgment of the court below is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted in the court below of robbery and sentenced to three to ten years’ confinement. The District Court appointed James R. Kirkland, Esq., an experienced counselor at this bar, to represent appellant on this appeal.

We have gone carefully over the record, and we find that the so-called bill of exceptions contains no exceptions taken to any ruling of the court in the trial, and an examination of-the bill satisfies us-the trial was in all respects fair. Mr. Kirkland, after laborious work to discover some proper ground on which to urge a reversal, has frankly stated that his conclusion is that there is nothing for this court now to review. The judgment of the court below is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 F.2d 201, 74 App. D.C. 174, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bache-v-united-states-cadc-1941.