Bache v. Marko
248 A.D. 810
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1936
StatusPublished
This text of 248 A.D. 810 (Bache v. Marko) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bache v. Marko, 248 A.D. 810 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur. (The judgment is for defendant on a counterclaim in an action to recover on stock transactions. The order denies motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
248 A.D. 810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bache-v-marko-nyappdiv-1936.