Bache, Halsey, Stuart, Shields, Inc. v. Mendoza
This text of 397 So. 2d 1011 (Bache, Halsey, Stuart, Shields, Inc. v. Mendoza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An order granting a motion to vacate a default is not appealable. Yates v. Roller Skating Rinks, Inc., 379 So.2d 1333 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Praet v. Martinez, 367 So.2d 657 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Fla.R.App.P. 9.130(a); cf. Pedro Realty, Inc. v. Silva, 392 So.2d 1005 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (permitting appeal of denial of motion to vacate default). No order setting aside the Final Judgment was entered by the trial court.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
397 So. 2d 1011, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bache-halsey-stuart-shields-inc-v-mendoza-fladistctapp-1981.