Bachdell's Appeal

56 Pa. 386, 1867 Pa. LEXIS 267
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 21, 1867
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 56 Pa. 386 (Bachdell's Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bachdell's Appeal, 56 Pa. 386, 1867 Pa. LEXIS 267 (Pa. 1867).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered, November 21st 1867, by

Thompson, J.

The court below erred in their allowance of interest to the appellees in this case. No more could be allowed than interest up to the day of sale. This is the uniform practice.

If authorities were needed for this, those cited in the appellant’s paper-book, Ramsey’s Appeal, 4 Watts 72, and Walton v. West, 4 Whart. 222, are sufficient. The excess of interest allowed after the sale and up to the maturity of the defendant’s obligation or single bill, must be deducted, and with this exception, we think the principles of the decree are right.

We will therefore reverse the decree, and send it back to be. corrected in this particular.

And now, November 21st 1867, decree of the court in awarding distribution to the judgment, Byers v. Crawford, is reversed, and the record is remitted, so that the said decree may be reformed according to the principles stated above, at the costs of the appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Courshon v. Milesburg Inn
2 Pa. D. & C.3d 726 (Centre County Court of Common Pleas, 1977)
Roos v. Silk Mills (B. Co. Tr. Co.)
19 A.2d 137 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)
Riffle v. Hustead
6 F.2d 439 (Third Circuit, 1925)
Spinks v. Jordan
66 So. 405 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1914)
In re Hershberger
208 F. 94 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 Pa. 386, 1867 Pa. LEXIS 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bachdells-appeal-pa-1867.