Bacharach v. American Union Realty Co.

163 A.D. 940
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1914
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 163 A.D. 940 (Bacharach v. American Union Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bacharach v. American Union Realty Co., 163 A.D. 940 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The notice of motion.given by the plaintiff was for judgment on the pleadings. Ho motion was made by the defendant for judgment in its favor. We think the Special Term of the City Coiu-t correctly denied the plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings; but no motion having been made to sustain the demurrer, the order should have been confined to a simple denial of the plaintiff’s motion, with ten dollars costs to the defendant. (See Ventriniglia v. Eichner, 138 App. Div. 274; Buff v. Queensbro Heights Band Corporation, 156 id. 913.) The determination appealed from and the order of the City Court are, therefore, modified as indicated, and as so modified affirmed, [941]*941with ten dollars costs and disbursements of this appeal. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Determination modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to defendant. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lobsitz v. E. Lissberger Co.
170 A.D. 897 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
163 A.D. 940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bacharach-v-american-union-realty-co-nyappdiv-1914.