Bach v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Bach v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

837 So. 2d 395, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 12, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 2663, 2002 WL 31833900

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedDecember 19, 2002

DocketNo. SC01-2598

StatusPublished

This text of 837 So. 2d 395 (Bach v. United Parcel Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bach v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 837 So. 2d 395, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 12, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 2663, 2002 WL 31833900 (Fla. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review the Fourth District Court of Appeal’s decision in Bach v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 808 So.2d 230 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), which adopted the analysis of the Third District Court of Appeal’s decision in Woodham v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., 793 So.2d 41 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), quashed, 829 So.2d 891 (Fla.2002). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 420 (Fla.1981). For the reasons expressed in our opinion in Woodham v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., 829 So.2d 891 (Fla.2002), the decision of the Fourth District is hereby quashed. We remand to the district court [396]*396for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is so ordered.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, and CANTERO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have for review the Fourth District Court of Appeal’s decision in Bach v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 808 So.2d 230 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), which adopted the analysis of the Third District Court of Appeal’s decision in Woodham v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., 793 So.2d 41 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), quashed, 829 So.2d 891 (Fla.2002). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 420 (Fla.1981). For the reasons expressed in our opinion in Woodham v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., 829 So.2d 891 (Fla.2002), the decision of the Fourth District is hereby quashed. We remand to the district court [396]*396for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is so ordered.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, and CANTERO, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

837 So. 2d 395, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 12, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 2663, 2002 WL 31833900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bach-v-united-parcel-service-inc-fla-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack