Bach v. Commissioner

318 F. App'x 220
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 19, 2009
DocketNo. 08-2299
StatusPublished

This text of 318 F. App'x 220 (Bach v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bach v. Commissioner, 318 F. App'x 220 (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

David Bach appeals from the tax court’s orders upholding the Commissioner’s deficiency determination and proposed collection activities with respect to his tax liability for the 1993 tax year, and denying his motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. See Bach v. Comm’r, IRS, Tax Ct. No. 06-23061-L [221]*221(U.S.T.C. Sept. 2, 2008; filed Sept. 10, 2008 & entered Sept. 11, 2008; filed Sept. 17, 2008 & entered Sept. 22, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
318 F. App'x 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bach-v-commissioner-ca4-2009.