Bach v. Commissioner

Fourth Circuit

Bach v. Commissioner

318 F. App'x 220

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 19, 2009·No. No. 08-2299·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

David Bach appeals from the tax court’s orders upholding the Commissioner’s deficiency determination and proposed collection activities with respect to his tax liability for the 1993 tax year, and denying his motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. See Bach v. Comm’r, IRS, Tax Ct. No. 06-23061-L [221] (U.S.T.C. Sept. 2, 2008; filed Sept. 10, 2008 & entered Sept. 11, 2008; filed Sept. 17, 2008 & entered Sept. 22, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

David Bach appeals from the tax court’s orders upholding the Commissioner’s deficiency determination and proposed collection activities with respect to his tax liability for the 1993 tax year, and denying his motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. See Bach v. Comm’r, IRS, Tax Ct. No. 06-23061-L [221] (U.S.T.C. Sept. 2, 2008; filed Sept. 10, 2008 & entered Sept. 11, 2008; filed Sept. 17, 2008 & entered Sept. 22, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Bach v. Commissioner, 318 F. App'x 220 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

318 F. App'x 220 (Bach v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.