Baccus v. Stirling

639 F. App'x 187
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 26, 2016
DocketNo. 15-8030
StatusPublished

This text of 639 F. App'x 187 (Baccus v. Stirling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baccus v. Stirling, 639 F. App'x 187 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Roosevelt Baccus appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Baccus v. Stirling, No. 9:15-cv-02670-DCN (D.S.C. filed Dec. 9, 2015; entered Dec. 10, 2015). We deny all of Baccus’s pending motions, including his motions for bail, to file an amicus curiae brief, to compel the production of videotapes, for a transcript at government expense, for disposition of informal briefing, and for judicial notice of his informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
639 F. App'x 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baccus-v-stirling-ca4-2016.