Baccus v. Scott

454 F. App'x 146
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 18, 2011
DocketNo. 11-7070
StatusPublished

This text of 454 F. App'x 146 (Baccus v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baccus v. Scott, 454 F. App'x 146 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

John Roosevelt Baccus appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Baccus v. Scott, No. 9:10-cv-02862-DCN, 2011 WL 3104129 (D.S.C. July 25, 2011). We deny Baccus’s [147]*147motions to compel the district court clerk’s office to provide copies of documents, for a transcript at Government expense, to review the record in the clerk’s office, and to consolidate this appeal with No. 11-7101.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
454 F. App'x 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baccus-v-scott-ca4-2011.