Bacchus v. Southeastern Mechanical Services, Inc.
This text of 453 F. App'x 384 (Bacchus v. Southeastern Mechanical Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Brian Bacchus appeals the district court’s order granting appellee’s summary judgment motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Bacchus’ motion for a subpoena and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bacchus v. Southeastern Mech. Servs., Inc., No. 8:10-cv-01684-RWT, 2011 WL 3022397 (D.Md. July 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
453 F. App'x 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bacchus-v-southeastern-mechanical-services-inc-ca4-2011.