Bacchiochi v. Town of Stafford, No. 48187 (Oct. 4, 1991)
This text of 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 8578 (Bacchiochi v. Town of Stafford, No. 48187 (Oct. 4, 1991)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Appellant argues that the time of receipt should control but offers no evidence as to when that occurred. Even if the date of receipt were used the court presumes that the postmarked notice was received within a few days of mailing. Appellant does not deny receipt of the notice.
The second reason for the Respondent, motion relates to the failure to annex a citation containing a notice of the return date and notice of requirement for filing an appearance, see Senie v. Carothers,
The Motion to Dismiss is granted. CT Page 8579
HON. ROBERT F. McWEENY SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 8578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bacchiochi-v-town-of-stafford-no-48187-oct-4-1991-connsuperct-1991.