Bacchi v. Fritz Companies, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bacchi v. Fritz Companies, Inc.

271 A.D.2d 558, 708 N.Y.S.2d 298, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4281

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 17, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action pursuant to Executive Law § 296 to recover damages for unlawful employment discrimination, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), dated October 30, 1998, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly found that there are issues of fact which require a trial. Accordingly, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment was properly denied (see generally, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320). O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Florio and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action pursuant to Executive Law § 296 to recover damages for unlawful employment discrimination, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), dated October 30, 1998, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly found that there are issues of fact which require a trial. Accordingly, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment was properly denied (see generally, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320). O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Florio and Smith, JJ., concur.

Bacchi v. Fritz Companies, Inc., 271 A.D.2d 558, 708 N.Y.S.2d 298, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4281 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

271 A.D.2d 558 (Bacchi v. Fritz Companies, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related