Bacani v. Rosenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bacani v. Rosenberg

52 A.D.3d 417, 861 N.Y.S.2d 24

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 26, 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 52 A.D.3d 417 (Bacani v. Rosenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bacani v. Rosenberg, 52 A.D.3d 417, 861 N.Y.S.2d 24 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley L. Sklar, J.), entered June 6, 2007, which granted defendants’ motions to dismiss the third cause of action in the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered February 15, 2007, for similar relief, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

The court properly dismissed the wrongful death claim on behalf of a stillborn fetus in this medical malpractice action. It has long been the law in this State that there is no right of recovery under our wrongful death statute (EPTL 5-4.1) for a fetus stillborn as a result of injuries received while en ventre sa mere (Endresz v Friedberg, 24 NY2d 478, 485 [1969]). We find no basis for departing from this long-standing and well-settled interpretation of the statute (see Matter of Knight-Ridder Broadcasting v Greenberg, 70 NY2d 151, 157 [1987]). Concur— Lippman, P.J., Tom, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley L. Sklar, J.), entered June 6, 2007, which granted defendants’ motions to dismiss the third cause of action in the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered February 15, 2007, for similar relief, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

The court properly dismissed the wrongful death claim on behalf of a stillborn fetus in this medical malpractice action. It has long been the law in this State that there is no right of recovery under our wrongful death statute (EPTL 5-4.1) for a fetus stillborn as a result of injuries received while en ventre sa mere (Endresz v Friedberg, 24 NY2d 478, 485 [1969]). We find no basis for departing from this long-standing and well-settled interpretation of the statute (see Matter of Knight-Ridder Broadcasting v Greenberg, 70 NY2d 151, 157 [1987]). Concur— Lippman, P.J., Tom, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.3d 417, 861 N.Y.S.2d 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bacani-v-rosenberg-nyappdiv-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack