Baca v. Baca

New Mexico Court of Appeals·Decided October 11, 2011·No. 30,973·Unpublished

Opinion

1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see 2 Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please 3 also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other 4 deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the 5 filing date.

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

7 JOSE RALPH BACA,

8 Petitioner-Appellee,

9 v. NO. 30,973

10 MELISSA D. BACA,

11 Respondent-Appellant.

12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 13 Geraldine E. Rivera, District Judge

14 Joyce M. Gentry 15 Albuquerque, NM

16 for Appellee

17 Melissa D. Baca 18 Albuquerque, NM

19 Pro Se Appellant

20 MEMORANDUM OPINION

21 VANZI, Judge. 1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has

3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

4 AFFIRMED.

5 IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 __________________________________ 7 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

8 WE CONCUR:

9 _________________________________ 10 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

11 _________________________________ 12 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baca v. Baca, (N.M. Ct. App. 2011).

Baca v. Baca (Baca v. Baca) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.