BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP v. MAESTRI, KENNETH

134 A.D.3d 1593, 21 N.Y.S.3d 925
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 31, 2015
DocketCA 15-00517
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 134 A.D.3d 1593 (BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP v. MAESTRI, KENNETH) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP v. MAESTRI, KENNETH, 134 A.D.3d 1593, 21 N.Y.S.3d 925 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Deborah H. Karalunas, J.), entered January 3, 2014. The order denied the motion of plaintiff to vacate an order dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is granted, the order dated December 13, 2012 is vacated and the complaint is reinstated.

Memorandum: In this mortgage foreclosure action, plaintiff appeals from an order that denied its motion seeking to vacate an order dated December 13, 2012, in which Supreme Court sua sponte dismissed the complaint as abandoned pursuant to CPLR 3215 (c). We agree with plaintiff that the court erred in denying the motion. The court erred in dismissing the complaint sua sponte inasmuch as “[u]se of the [sua sponte] power of dismissal must be restricted to the most extraordinary circumstances, and no such extraordinary circumstances are present in this case” (Midfirst Bank v Bellinger, 117 AD3d 1520, 1522 [2014] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Alexander, 124 AD3d 838, 839 [2015]). Indeed, a plaintiff has not abandoned a foreclosure action where, as here, the plaintiff has taken the preliminary step toward obtaining a default judgment of foreclosure and sale by moving for an order of reference within one year of the defendant’s default (see HSBC Bank USA, N.A., 124 AD3d at 839; Klein v St. Cyprian Props., Inc., 100 AD3d 711, 712 [2012]). Present — Scudder, P.J., Smith, Centra, Peradotto and Carni, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fraccola v. 1st Choice Realty, Inc.
167 N.Y.S.3d 870 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Reamer
2020 NY Slip Op 05641 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Patrick
2019 NY Slip Op 4912 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
CitiMortgage, Inc. Ex Rel. CitiFinancial Mortgage Co. v. Lottridge
143 A.D.3d 1093 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
CITIMORGAGE, INC. v. CARTER, KIP C.
140 A.D.3d 1663 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
CITIMORTGAGE, INC. v. PETRAGNANI, JESSICA L.
137 A.D.3d 1688 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 A.D.3d 1593, 21 N.Y.S.3d 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bac-home-loans-servicing-lp-v-maestri-kenneth-nyappdiv-2015.