Babylon Milk & Cream Co. v. Wickham

New York Court of Appeals

Babylon Milk & Cream Co. v. Wickham

196 N.E.2d 559, 13 N.Y.2d 1127

DecidedJanuary 16, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 196 N.E.2d 559 (Babylon Milk & Cream Co. v. Wickham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Babylon Milk & Cream Co. v. Wickham, 196 N.E.2d 559, 13 N.Y.2d 1127 (N.Y. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs, solely on the ground stated by the Appellate Division; that is, that on this record petitioner is not aggrieved. Like the Appellate Division, we find it impossible on this record to reach the merits of the issue sought to be presented by petitioner, viz., as to the power of the Commissioner to limit the number of routes to be operated by a milk dealer.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke and Scileppl Taking no part: Judge Bergan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, without costs, solely on the ground stated by the Appellate Division; that is, that on this record petitioner is not aggrieved. Like the Appellate Division, we find it impossible on this record to reach the merits of the issue sought to be presented by petitioner, viz., as to the power of the Commissioner to limit the number of routes to be operated by a milk dealer.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke and Scileppl Taking no part: Judge Bergan.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 N.E.2d 559, 13 N.Y.2d 1127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/babylon-milk-cream-co-v-wickham-ny-1964.