Baby Products Antitrust v.
This text of Baby Products Antitrust v. (Baby Products Antitrust v.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________
Nos. 12-1165, 12-1166 & 12-1167 ________________
IN RE BABY PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Kevin Young, Appellant (No. 12-1165) Clark Hampe, Appellant (No. 12-1166) Allison Lederer, Appellant (No. 12-1167) ________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action Nos. 2-06-cv-00242 / 2-09-cv-06151) District Judge: Honorable Anita B. Brody ________________
Argued September 19, 2012
Before AMBRO, GREENAWAY, JR., and O’MALLEY,* Circuit Judge
(Opinion filed February 19, 2013)
ORDER AMENDING PRECEDENTIAL OPINION
AMBRO, Circuit Judge
IT IS NOW ORDERED that the published Opinion in the above case filed February 19, 2013, be amended as follows:
On page 15, footnote 7, lines 5–6, delete the phrase “(en banc)”.
By the Court, /s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge Dated: March 28, 2013
* Honorable Kathleen M. O’Malley, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Baby Products Antitrust v., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baby-products-antitrust-v-ca3-2013.