Baboolal v. Baboolal

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Baboolal v. Baboolal

893 So. 2d 700, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1673, 2005 WL 387676

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 18, 2005

DocketNo. 5D03-3361

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 893 So. 2d 700 (Baboolal v. Baboolal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baboolal v. Baboolal, 893 So. 2d 700, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1673, 2005 WL 387676 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

COBB, W., Senior Judge.

John Baboolal appeals the trial court’s nonfinal order setting aside a default and default judgment. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(a)(5). We must dismiss the appeal as being untimely because the notice of appeal was not filed within thirty days of the date the order setting aside the default final judgment was entered. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(b). Baboolal’s motion for rehearing did not toll the time for filing an appeal, and the order denying the motion for rehearing is not an appealable order. See Caufield, v. Cantele, 837 So.2d 371 (Fla.2002); Nationwide Ins. Co. v. Forrest, 682 So.2d 672 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

DISMISSED.

MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COBB, W., Senior Judge.

John Baboolal appeals the trial court’s nonfinal order setting aside a default and default judgment. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(a)(5). We must dismiss the appeal as being untimely because the notice of appeal was not filed within thirty days of the date the order setting aside the default final judgment was entered. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(b). Baboolal’s motion for rehearing did not toll the time for filing an appeal, and the order denying the motion for rehearing is not an appealable order. See Caufield, v. Cantele, 837 So.2d 371 (Fla.2002); Nationwide Ins. Co. v. Forrest, 682 So.2d 672 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

DISMISSED.

MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

893 So. 2d 700, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1673, 2005 WL 387676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baboolal-v-baboolal-fladistctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack