Babione v. Sanguienetti

123 P.2d 85, 50 Cal. App. 2d 855, 1942 Cal. App. LEXIS 1020
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedMarch 11, 1942
DocketCiv. No. 3039
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 123 P.2d 85 (Babione v. Sanguienetti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Babione v. Sanguienetti, 123 P.2d 85, 50 Cal. App. 2d 855, 1942 Cal. App. LEXIS 1020 (Cal. Ct. App. 1942).

Opinion

THE COURT.

The respondents have regularly moved to dismiss this appeal on the ground that neither the transcript nor appellant’s points and authorities have been filed within the required time or at all. It appears from the clerk’s certificate that no request for the transcript was ever filed; that no proceedings for a bill of exceptions were instituted and none are now pending, and that the time to institute such proceedings has expired. A letter to the court from the attorney for the appellant states in effect that the appellant has abandoned the appeal.

The motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Warren
50 Cal. App. 2d 854 (California Court of Appeal, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 P.2d 85, 50 Cal. App. 2d 855, 1942 Cal. App. LEXIS 1020, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/babione-v-sanguienetti-calctapp-1942.