Babin v. North Florida Shipyards, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Babin v. North Florida Shipyards, Inc.

709 So. 2d 657, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5625, 1998 WL 252475

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 20, 1998

DocketNo. 96-3184

StatusPublished

This text of 709 So. 2d 657 (Babin v. North Florida Shipyards, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Babin v. North Florida Shipyards, Inc., 709 So. 2d 657, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5625, 1998 WL 252475 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION, AND MOTION FOR REHEARING OR CERTIFICATION

JOANOS, Judge.

Appellee Primeco, Inc. (Primeco) has filed a motion for clarification of the opinion issued with regard to this case on December 31, 1997. Primeco asks that we edit or delete the second sentence in the first full paragraph on page 3 of the opinion, to reflect that a determination regarding the functioning or malfunctioning of the highlift has not been made. We grant the motion for clarification, and substitute the following sentence for the second sentence which appears in the first full paragraph on page 3 of the opinion: “While he was working on the highlift, Babin fell to his death.”

We deny in all respects the motion for rehearing or for certification of a question to the Florida Supreme Court filed by appellee North Florida Shipyard, Inc. (NFS).

BOOTH and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION, AND MOTION FOR REHEARING OR CERTIFICATION

JOANOS, Judge.

Appellee Primeco, Inc. (Primeco) has filed a motion for clarification of the opinion issued with regard to this case on December 31, 1997. Primeco asks that we edit or delete the second sentence in the first full paragraph on page 3 of the opinion, to reflect that a determination regarding the functioning or malfunctioning of the highlift has not been made. We grant the motion for clarification, and substitute the following sentence for the second sentence which appears in the first full paragraph on page 3 of the opinion: “While he was working on the highlift, Babin fell to his death.”

We deny in all respects the motion for rehearing or for certification of a question to the Florida Supreme Court filed by appellee North Florida Shipyard, Inc. (NFS).

BOOTH and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

709 So. 2d 657, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5625, 1998 WL 252475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/babin-v-north-florida-shipyards-inc-fladistctapp-1998.