Babij v. Department of Corrections

931 So. 2d 1049, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 10270, 2006 WL 1697641
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 22, 2006·No. No. 1D06-1034·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By “Motion for Review” pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.430, Jonathan Babij seeks review of the circuit court’s denial of his motion for relief from an order that found him to be indigent but placed a lien on his inmate trust account to recover court costs and fees related to his filing of a petition for writ of mandamus in that forum.

As we noted in LaMadline v. Crosby, 867 So.2d 552 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004), rule 9.430 only authorizes the review of an order of a lower tribunal relating to a request to proceed as an indigent in appellate proceedings. We therefore treated [1050]*1050the motion for review as a petition for writ of certiorari, but conclude that certiorari review is inappropriate because Babij will have an adequate remedy on appeal from the final order entered in the circuit court proceedings. See Higueras v. Crosby, 924 So.2d 18 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). Accordingly, we deny the petition without prejudice to Babij’s right to pursue that course once the circuit court proceedings have concluded.

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIO-RARI DENIED.

BENTON, POLSTON, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Babij v. Department of Corrections, 931 So. 2d 1049, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 10270, 2006 WL 1697641 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

931 So. 2d 1049 (Babij v. Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lamadline v. Crosby
867 So. 2d 552 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Higueras v. Crosby
924 So. 2d 18 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)