Babi v. David

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Babi v. David

35 A.D.3d 266, 824 N.Y.S.2d 902

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 19, 2006·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Bart Stone, J.), entered August 23, 2005, which, in a CPLR article 78 proceeding pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL), granted respondent Police Department’s Records Access Appeals Officer’s cross motion to dismiss, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The proceeding, which was commenced while petitioner’s [267] administrative appeal was still pending three months after he had filed it, and dismissed by the application court on the ground “there has been no final agency determination,” was rendered moot by respondent’s issuance of a determination granting petitioner’s FOIL requests to the extent of remanding the matter for a further document search by the FOIL Unit (cf. Matter of Taylor v New York City Police Dept. FOIL Unit, 25 AD3d 347 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 714 [2006] [proceeding rendered moot by respondents’ production of responsive records as part of their motion to dismiss]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Tom, Mazzarelli, Friedman and McGuire, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Bart Stone, J.), entered August 23, 2005, which, in a CPLR article 78 proceeding pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL), granted respondent Police Department’s Records Access Appeals Officer’s cross motion to dismiss, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The proceeding, which was commenced while petitioner’s [267] administrative appeal was still pending three months after he had filed it, and dismissed by the application court on the ground “there has been no final agency determination,” was rendered moot by respondent’s issuance of a determination granting petitioner’s FOIL requests to the extent of remanding the matter for a further document search by the FOIL Unit (cf. Matter of Taylor v New York City Police Dept. FOIL Unit, 25 AD3d 347 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 714 [2006] [proceeding rendered moot by respondents’ production of responsive records as part of their motion to dismiss]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Tom, Mazzarelli, Friedman and McGuire, JJ.

Babi v. David, 35 A.D.3d 266, 824 N.Y.S.2d 902 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

35 A.D.3d 266 (Babi v. David) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related