Babcock & Wilcox Company v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.

Second Circuit

Babcock & Wilcox Company v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.

430 F.2d 1177, 167 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 65, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4794

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedNovember 21, 1968

Docket32974_1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 430 F.2d 1177 (Babcock & Wilcox Company v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Babcock & Wilcox Company v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., 430 F.2d 1177, 167 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 65, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4794 (2d Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

430 F.2d 1177

The BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY, Assignee of the Interference Parties Rothemund and Koch, Appellee,
v.
COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., Assignee of the Interference Parties Powell, Schroedter, Clayton and Knust, Appellant.

No. 263.

Docket 32974.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued November 21, 1968.

Decided November 21, 1968.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut; Robert C. Zampano, Judge.

Arthur S. Tenser, New York City (Brumbaugh, Graves, Donohue & Raymond, New York City, Ralph G. Elliot, Alcorn, Bakewell & Smith, Hartford, Conn., on the brief), for appellant.

Roland T. Bryan, Stamford, Conn. (Haynes N. Johnson, Robertson, Bryan, Parmelee & Johnson, Stamford, Conn., Joseph M. Maguire, New York City, on the brief), for appellee.

Before KAUFMAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and TENNEY, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM:

We affirmed in open court1 the decision of the District Court on the opinion of Judge Zampano, reported at 314 F. Supp. 235 (D.Conn.1968).

Notes:

*

Of the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation

1

On November 21, 1968

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI